From: Justin Tobler <jltobler@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2025 01:36:10 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/7] strbuf: split out logic to humanise byte values
Message-ID: <lftfcdnv7cn6ajrkjiim3z2ympvlfmlvtfco3x2wwpknytorif@3uutxricxy5d>
In-Reply-To: <xmqqms3j5il1.fsf@gitster.g>

On 25/12/16 10:19AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Justin Tobler <jltobler@gmail.com> writes:
> 
> > +		*value = xstrfmt(_("%u"), (unsigned)bytes);
> 
> Does this "%u" need translation?
> 
> I very much doubt it, but if it did, this does need TRANSLATORS
> comment.

Ya, I don't think one should be necessary. Will remove in the next
version.

I think I made the same mistake in humanise_count() in a later patch.
I'll also adjust it there.

> 
> > +		*unit = humanise_rate ?
> > +			       /* TRANSLATORS: IEC 80000-13:2008 byte/second */
> > +			       Q_("byte/s", "bytes/s", bytes) :
> > +			       /* TRANSLATORS: IEC 80000-13:2008 byte */
> > +			       Q_("byte", "bytes", bytes);
> >  	}
> >  }
> >  
> > +static void strbuf_humanise(struct strbuf *buf, off_t bytes, unsigned flags)
> > +{
> > +	char *value;
> > +	const char *unit;
> > +
> > +	humanise_bytes(bytes, &value, &unit, flags);
> > +	strbuf_addf(buf, _("%s %s"), value, unit);
> 
> This definitely needs the TRANSLATORS comment to tell what is going on.

Ok, will do in the next version. Thanks :)

-Justin