From: Joachim Schmitz Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2013 06:31:48 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 11/13] remote-hg: force remote push Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <87eheqq6dk.fsf@59A2.org> Jed Brown wrote: > Felipe Contreras writes: > >> On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 2:48 PM, Jed Brown wrote: ... >>> We have >>> to assume that every Git (remote-hg) User is dealing with Hg Team >> >> No, we don't. > > Really? If there is no Hg Team, why bother with an Hg upstream? Huh? the counterpart of "every user" wpuld be "some users" and not "no user" or "no HG team", isn't it?