From: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2008 09:48:41 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: add a planning document for the next CLI revamp
Message-ID: <gemhdp$lev$1@ger.gmane.org>
In-Reply-To: <1225691960.20883.41.camel@maia.lan>

Sam Vilain wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-11-02 at 14:27 -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
>> 
>>>> +  * 'git push --matching' does what 'git push' does today (without
>>>> +    explicit configuration)
>>>
>>> I think this is reasonable even without other changes, just to override
>>> any configuration.
>> 
>> I don't.  Can't you say "git push $there HEAD" these days?  I vaguely
>> recall that there is a way to configure push that way for people too lazy
>> to type "origin HEAD" after "git push".
> 
> I don't think it's about laziness, it's more about making sure that
> without specifying behaviour, the action of the command is conservative.
> Pushing all matching refs is not conservative; it's "magic".  And in my
> experience, people get bitten by it, because they think, "ok, time to
> push this branch", type "git push" and then a lot more than they
> expected gets pushed.
> 
> I can see that some people want this behaviour by default; but to me
> "push the current branch back to where it came from" seems like far more
> a rational default for at least 90% of users.

"git remote <remote> push" for push matching?

-- 
Jakub Narebski
Warsaw, Poland
ShadeHawk on #git