From: Jakub Narebski Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 16:47:58 GMT Subject: Re: fsck --full is Ok, but clones are not, "missing commits"?! Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20080416161742.GC3133@dpotapov.dyndns.org> Dmitry Potapov wrote: > On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 04:56:08PM +0200, Johannes Sixt wrote: >> >> No. The reason why git clone'd repositories have problems is that >> git-upload-pack sends a pack that does not contain the hidden objects; but >> since the cloned repository doesn't have the info/grafts, it tries to look >> up the hidden, now missing, objects, and fails. > > In my experiment, there was no problem with hidden commits and objects > as long as they presented in the original repository. Maybe, it is > because I cloned it as locally using: > >    git clone PATH-TO-ORIG-REPO PATH-TO-DEST-REPO > > Maybe things would be as you say if I used git:// file:// should be enough. -- Jakub Narebski Warsaw, Poland ShadeHawk on #git