From: Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2009 10:20:59 GMT Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Dec 2009, #03; Tue, 08) Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <7vmy1tg6ll.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 4:25 PM, Junio C Hamano > * nd/sparse (2009-11-25) 20 commits. >  (merged to 'next' on 2009-11-25 at 71380f5) >  + tests: rename duplicate t1009 >  (merged to 'next' on 2009-11-23 at f712a41) >  + sparse checkout: inhibit empty worktree >  + Add tests for sparse checkout >  + read-tree: add --no-sparse-checkout to disable sparse checkout support >  + unpack-trees(): ignore worktree check outside checkout area >  + unpack_trees(): apply $GIT_DIR/info/sparse-checkout to the final index >  + unpack-trees(): "enable" sparse checkout and load $GIT_DIR/info/sparse-checkout >  + unpack-trees.c: generalize verify_* functions >  + unpack-trees(): add CE_WT_REMOVE to remove on worktree alone >  + Introduce "sparse checkout" >  + dir.c: export excluded_1() and add_excludes_from_file_1() >  + excluded_1(): support exclude files in index >  + unpack-trees(): carry skip-worktree bit over in merged_entry() >  + Read .gitignore from index if it is skip-worktree >  + Avoid writing to buffer in add_excludes_from_file_1() >  + Teach Git to respect skip-worktree bit (writing part) >  + Teach Git to respect skip-worktree bit (reading part) >  + Introduce "skip-worktree" bit in index, teach Git to get/set this bit >  + Add test-index-version >  + update-index: refactor mark_valid() in preparation for new options > > There were some test glitches reported and at least one test seems to > be broken in the sense that it is not testing what it is trying to. > Fix-up expected. Indeed. I'm working on it. Hopefully I'll have something in the next few days. -- Duy