From: Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 04:32:17 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] init-db: support --import to add all files and commit right after init
Message-ID: <fcaeb9bf0903242132k71e78219xfda5553854df4a2c@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20090325041934.GA15524@coredump.intra.peff.net>

2009/3/25 Jeff King <peff@peff.net>:
>> +-m <message>::
>> +--import=<message>::
>> +
>> +Commit everything to the newly initialized repository. This is equivalent to:
>
> Maybe this is being too lazy, but I think it would be useful to allow
> just "--import" without a message to default to "Initial commit",
> "initial import from `basename $PWD`", or something like that.

I tend to do "commit -q -m i", not a big deal for two more keystrokes.
My initial version allowed "git init /path/to/workdir" too so it might
be ambiguous for optional message. So all vote for "Initial commit"?
Dynamic message seems overkill because most of the cases, this is a
throw away repository.

>> +             else if (!strcmp(arg, "--import") || !strcmp(arg, "-m")) {
>> +                     if (i+1 >= argc)
>> +                             die("--import requires an import message");
>> +                     import_message = argv[2];
>> +                     i++;
>> +                     argv++;
>> +             }
>
> I seem to recall that we were phasing out "--long-option <arg>" at some
> point, and that all long-options should use "--long-option=". But maybe
> I am mis-remembering.

I did not know too. Any reference?
-- 
Duy