From: Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 21:32:15 GMT Subject: Re: index manipulation quickref Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <7vac1tvuyr.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> On 12/13/06, Junio C Hamano wrote: > I think this goes in the wrong direction. For "newbies" the > Porcelain-ish set is supposed to be enough and if there is > something missing that they need to do update-index command > itself or a pipeline that involves update-index to achieve > common tasks, we should enhance Porcelain-ish that captures the > pattern. It is supposed to be porcelain command only. I figure what operation a user may need when manipulating index, then find the corresponding porcelain command. As you can see, we have porcelain commands for most of operations. The missing piece is reset a file in index (and maybe "git cat-file ::file" -- it's too cryptic). Hopefully "git reset -- file" will be implemented soon. --