From: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 00:51:16 GMT
Subject: Re: Efficiency of initial clone from server
Message-ID: <eqr1up$uvv$1@sea.gmane.org>
In-Reply-To: <7vd54f85du.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>

Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu> writes:
> 
>> Even before we get Git 1.5.0 installed on master.kernel.org (and we
>> should really ask hpa to do that), is there a reason we haven't done
>> something like this across all of the kernel repo's on
>> master.kernel.org?
>>
>> for i in <list of kernel git repo's on master.kernel.org>
>> do
>>    pushd $i
>>    if [ ! -f objects/info/alternates ]; then
>>      echo /pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git/objects \
>>         > objects/info/alternates
>>      git repack -a -d -l
>>    fi
>>    popd
>> done
> 
> Perhaps s/<list of kernel git repo's on master.kernel.org>/& minus a few/?
> 
> "Minus a few" are (obviously) Linus's repository and bkcvs
> historical ones (I think there are two of them).
> 
> Other than that I do not think of a major problem.  Repacking
> into one would inconvenience http clients but that is not a new
> issue and would have happened when the owner of the individual
> repository chose to do so anyway.

So objects/info/http-alternates should be also set, I guess...

-- 
Jakub Narebski
Warsaw, Poland
ShadeHawk on #git