From: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 01:34:29 GMT
Subject: Re: [RFC] Submodules in GIT
Message-ID: <elviac$63t$1@sea.gmane.org>
In-Reply-To: <e7bda7770612151720w2e65fe83s9942e1ec1f7092a2@mail.gmail.com>

Torgil Svensson wrote:

> On 12/16/06, Torgil Svensson <torgil.svensson@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> example tree object:
>>
>> 100644 blob <sha1 of blob>    README
>> 100644 blob <sha1 of blob>    REPORTING-BUGS
>> 100644 link <sha1 of blob>     <sha1 of commit>
>> 040000 tree <sha1 of tree>    arch
>> 040000 tree <sha1 of tree>    block
>> 040000 link <sha1 of tree>     <sha1 of commit>
>>
> 
> Sorry, I was sloppy and forgot the names:
> 
> 100644 blob <sha1 of blob>    README
> 100644 blob <sha1 of blob>    REPORTING-BUGS
> 100644 link <sha1 of blob>     <sha1 of commit>   AUTHORS
> 040000 tree <sha1 of tree>    arch
> 040000 tree <sha1 of tree>    block
> 040000 link <sha1 of tree>     <sha1 of commit>   misc
> 
> Now it doesn't looks like trees/blobs anymore so maybe a link object
> is handy: 
> 
> 100644 blob <sha1 of blob>    README
> 100644 blob <sha1 of blob>    REPORTING-BUGS
> 100644 link <sha1 of link>      AUTHORS
> 040000 tree <sha1 of tree>    arch
> 040000 tree <sha1 of tree>    block
> 040000 link <sha1 of link>     misc
> 
> link-object:
> <sha1 of commit>
> <sha1 of tree/blob>

What do you need <sha1 of tree/blob> for in link-object? Wouldn't you
use usually the sha1 of top tree of a commit, which is uniquely defined
by commit object, so you need only <ahs1 of commit>?

-- 
Jakub Narebski
Warsaw, Poland
ShadeHawk on #git