From: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 09:43:41 GMT
Subject: Re: [RFD] making separate-remote layout easier to use
Message-ID: <ekbnhe$naq$1@sea.gmane.org>
In-Reply-To: <7v1wnqwoxz.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>

Junio C Hamano wrote:

>  * Subsequent fetch, when the glob is not '+' variant, would
>    download the config from the remote in order to see which are
>    marked as "rewinds", and ignores the branches that are marked
>    as such.
> 
> I am a bit unhappy that subsequent fetches have to re-read the
> remote config every time.  I can sort-of-see we can cram the
> "this is expected to be rewound" information as part of
> peek-remote exchange to avoid the overhead, but I do not think
> it is easily doable for dumb transports without breaking the
> backward compatibility.

Perhaps below the "Pull: refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/*" (or config
equivalent) we should list (in some format) branches which are not to be
fetched becaus they don't fast forward. One option, namely
  Pull:-refs/heads/pu:refs/remotes/origin/pu
(or config equivalent)comes to mind. It has the advantage that when we
decide to fetch this branch, it would be as easy as changing '-' to '+'.
Or we can use '!' instead of '-' if you think it is more readable (probably
is).
-- 
Jakub Narebski
Warsaw, Poland
ShadeHawk on #git