From: Jakub Narebski Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 10:07:31 GMT Subject: Re: [BUG] StGit removed git branch of the same name as StGit branch Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Catalin Marinas wrote: > On 20/11/06, Jakub Narebski wrote: >> When removing stg branch (I wanted to remove >> heads/base/gitweb/web) using "stg branch --delete gitweb/web" it >> deleted also git branch when I wanted to remove only the StGit managed >> indicator. Fortunately I was able to recover the branch from reflog, as >> StGit didn't delete reflog with deletion of git branch. >> >> Perhaps that is correct behavior... but certainly unexpected. > > I've never thought anyone would see a different meaing for the > "branch" command. What you wanted to do was the reverse of the "init" > command. Maybe something like "uninit" or a "--uninit" option to > "branch". Yes, that is what I wanted. "stg branch --unmanage" or something like that. By the way, why "stg branch --delete" doesn't remove reflog? Not that I'm complaining, because it sure saved some work when resurrecting branch, and I didn't loose reflog info. -- Jakub Narebski Warsaw, Poland ShadeHawk on #git