From: Jakub Narebski Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 23:40:26 GMT Subject: Re: [CFH] Remotes conversion script Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20060924231108.GE20017@pasky.or.cz> Petr Baudis wrote: > Dear diary, on Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 01:04:41AM CEST, I got a letter > where Jakub Narebski said that... >> Petr Baudis wrote: >> >> > Dear diary, on Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 12:34:24AM CEST, I got a letter >> > where Santi said that... >> >> It could be I'm wrong (for sure, I miss something), but I see the >> >> branches/ files like [remote] sections files with just one fetch: >> >> >> >> .git/branches/git: >> >> git://...../git.gi >> >> >> >> would be: >> >> >> >> [remote "git"] >> >> url=git://...../git.git >> >> fetch=refs/heads/master:refs/heads/git >> > >> > That's basically right, the point is that with moving to remotes >> > support, we will make each remote live in its own separate namespace, >> >> Which is overkill if we fetch only from one directory. > > Why? s/directory/repository/ of course. And as of why: I'd rather have 'next', 'maint, 'html', 'man' in main namespace (with 'origin' substituting 'master') instead of remotes/origin/next etc. -- Jakub Narebski Warsaw, Poland ShadeHawk on #git