From: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 12:44:39 GMT
Subject: Re: That improved git-gui blame viewer..
Message-ID: <e5bfff550706130544m40e2f210p2412ef7fde2867a1@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <e5bfff550706130411g151b76e3sa2e351aff5dbb35b@mail.gmail.com>

On 6/13/07, Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Some weeks ago I've started to experiment with git-log as a
> replacement for git-rev-list (as suggested by Linus in a thread).
>
> I found some problems and so I stopped

Now I remember why I've quit with git-log: due to a big performance
regression under Windows.

I've made some tests on a git tree copied under Windows:

running:  git rev-list --header --parents --boundary HEAD > tmp.txt

1,38s
1,37s
1,39s

then running: git log --pretty=raw -z --parents --boundary HEAD > tmp.txt

8,87s
8,87s
8,86s
8,86s


So at the end git-log seems 6,4 times slower the git-rev-list !

This would mean the end of the story for me.


Marco