From: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 05:33:23 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/22] sequencer: allow the sequencer to take custody of malloc()ed data
Message-ID: <e0a00df7-d4e7-3809-ae93-b29b1f1c7ea4@kdbg.org>
In-Reply-To: <733a899a-470b-79b3-b059-b38313a7057d@gmail.com>

Am 29.08.2016 um 23:59 schrieb Jakub Narębski:
> W dniu 29.08.2016 o 10:04, Johannes Schindelin pisze:
>> -#define REPLAY_OPTS_INIT { -1, -1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, NULL, NULL, NULL, 0, 0, NULL }
>> +#define REPLAY_OPTS_INIT { -1, -1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, NULL, NULL, NULL, 0, 0, NULL, NULL, 0, 0 }
>
> Nb. it is a pity that we cannot use named initializers for structs,
> so called designated inits.  It would make this macro more readable.

It is actually pointless to add the 0's and NULL's here. This should  be 
sufficient:

#define REPLAY_OPTS_INIT { -1, -1 }

because initialization with 0 (or NULL) is the default for any omitted 
members.

-- Hannes