From: Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2018 11:16:10 GMT
Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Oct 2018, #01; Wed, 10)
Message-ID: <dfa79ba2-0dba-1d74-1a81-543902d20bef@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <xmqq8t36mk4t.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com>

On 10/10/2018 1:43 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
> * ds/reachable-topo-order (2018-09-21) 7 commits
>   - revision.c: refactor basic topo-order logic
>   - revision.h: add whitespace in flag definitions
>   - commit/revisions: bookkeeping before refactoring
>   - revision.c: begin refactoring --topo-order logic
>   - test-reach: add rev-list tests
>   - test-reach: add run_three_modes method
>   - prio-queue: add 'peek' operation
>
>   The revision walker machinery learned to take advantage of the
>   commit generation numbers stored in the commit-graph file.
>
>   What's the status of this topic?
I've reached out for review, especially on the rather large patch 
"revision.c: refactor basic topo-order logic" but have received no 
messages about it. I don't think anyone has even done a cursory style 
review.

I really think that this is a valuable topic, and it would be nice to 
have in 2.20, but I'm not pushing to merge something that no one has 
reviewed.

> * ds/format-commit-graph-docs (2018-08-21) 2 commits
>   - commit-graph.txt: improve formatting for asciidoc
>   - Docs: Add commit-graph tech docs to Makefile
>
>   Design docs for the commit-graph machinery is now made into HTML as
>   well as text.
>
>   Will discard.
>   I am inclined to drop these, as I do not see much clarity in HTML
>   output over the text source.  Opinions?
These have been marked for discard for a few weeks. I agree they should 
be discarded.

Thanks,
-Stolee