From: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@talktalk.net>
Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 14:51:31 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] rebase -i: silence stash apply
Message-ID: <decdfff1-dd21-4e10-44d5-9dbee38ba05f@talktalk.net>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1.1705181246430.3610@virtualbox>

Hi Johannes

Thanks for your reply
On 18/05/17 11:49, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> Hi Phillip,
> 
> On Thu, 18 May 2017, Phillip Wood wrote:
> 
>> diff --git a/sequencer.c b/sequencer.c
>> index f8bc18badf1a3fb1b39656501c5a316e229968d2..311728a145dfc66e230334221a2610468239932d 100644
>> --- a/sequencer.c
>> +++ b/sequencer.c
>> @@ -1914,6 +1914,8 @@ static int apply_autostash(struct replay_opts *opts)
>>   	strbuf_trim(&stash_sha1);
>>   
>>   	child.git_cmd = 1;
>> +	child.no_stdout = 1;
>> +	child.no_stderr = 1;
>>   	argv_array_push(&child.args, "stash");
>>   	argv_array_push(&child.args, "apply");
>>   	argv_array_push(&child.args, stash_sha1.buf);
> 
> If I remember correctly, then the shell version prints the output in case
> of an error.

The shell version prints it's own error message if there's an error, the 
C version does this as well

Shell version:
apply_autostash () {
	if test -f "$state_dir/autostash"
	then
		stash_sha1=$(cat "$state_dir/autostash")
		if git stash apply $stash_sha1 2>&1 >/dev/null
		then
			echo "$(gettext 'Applied autostash.')"
		else
			git stash store -m "autostash" -q $stash_sha1 ||
			die "$(eval_gettext "Cannot store \$stash_sha1")"
			gettext 'Applying autostash resulted in conflicts.
Your changes are safe in the stash.
You can run "git stash pop" or "git stash drop" at any time.
'
		fi
	fi
}

C version:
static int apply_autostash(struct replay_opts *opts)
{
	struct strbuf stash_sha1 = STRBUF_INIT;
	struct child_process child = CHILD_PROCESS_INIT;
	int ret = 0;

	if (!read_oneliner(&stash_sha1, rebase_path_autostash(), 1)) {
		strbuf_release(&stash_sha1);
		return 0;
	}
	strbuf_trim(&stash_sha1);

	child.git_cmd = 1;
	child.no_stdout = 1;
	child.no_stderr = 1;
	argv_array_push(&child.args, "stash");
	argv_array_push(&child.args, "apply");
	argv_array_push(&child.args, stash_sha1.buf);
	if (!run_command(&child))
		printf(_("Applied autostash.\n"));
	else {
		struct child_process store = CHILD_PROCESS_INIT;

		store.git_cmd = 1;
		argv_array_push(&store.args, "stash");
		argv_array_push(&store.args, "store");
		argv_array_push(&store.args, "-m");
		argv_array_push(&store.args, "autostash");
		argv_array_push(&store.args, "-q");
		argv_array_push(&store.args, stash_sha1.buf);
		if (run_command(&store))
			ret = error(_("cannot store %s"), stash_sha1.buf);
		else
			printf(_("Applying autostash resulted in conflicts.\n"
				"Your changes are safe in the stash.\n"
				"You can run \"git stash pop\" or"
				" \"git stash drop\" at any time.\n"));
	}

	strbuf_release(&stash_sha1);
	return ret;
}


> We already imitated that behavior in `git commit`
> (https://github.com/git-for-windows/git/blob/v2.13.0.windows.1/sequencer.c#L674-L684):
> 
> 		/* hide stderr on success */
> 		struct strbuf buf = STRBUF_INIT;
> 		int rc = pipe_command(&cmd,
> 				      NULL, 0,
> 				      /* stdout is already redirected */
> 				      NULL, 0,
> 				      &buf, 0);
> 		if (rc)
> 			fputs(buf.buf, stderr);
> 		strbuf_release(&buf);
> 
> I think that would be the appropriate approach here, too.

I can change it to do this if you think it is an improvement but the 
existing error message seems fairly clear to me and I think (though I 
haven't checked) that the call to stash store should print out the id of 
the stash for the user

> P.S.: it may be a very good idea to accompany this patch (as well as the
> previous one) by a patch to the test suite to verify that the fixed code
> does not regress.

I agree that a test for this (and probably my other changes) would be 
useful, I'll try and put something together but it won't be until after 
the end of next week.

Thanks

Phillip