From: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2021 03:33:43 GMT
Subject: Re: changing the experimental 'git switch' (was: [Summit topic] Improving Git UX)
Message-ID: <dc479498-428e-7cd4-cad5-da19875a9ad8@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <211021.86wnm6l1ip.gmgdl@evledraar.gmail.com>

On 21/10/21 23.45, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
> In summary, I think it should be changed to act like this:
>      
>      |---------------------------+------------------------+---------------------------|
>      | What                      | Now                    | New                       |
>      |---------------------------+------------------------+---------------------------|
>      | Switch                    | git switch existing    | git switch existing       |
>      | Error                     | git switch nonexisting | <no change (errors)>      |
>      | Switch with --merge       | git switch -m branch   | git switch --merge branch |
>      | Create                    | git switch -c new      | git switch -n new         |
>      | Create from existing      | N/A                    | git switch -c new [<old>] |
>      | Move & switch to existing | N/A                    | git switch -m new [<old>] |
>      |---------------------------+------------------------+---------------------------|
> 

For switch with --merge case, it seems like adding long-option variant 
of -m (--merge), right?

-- 
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara