From: joak-pet@online.no Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2022 21:56:02 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] git-prompt: make colourization consistent Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20220602145935.10512-1-joak-pet@online.no> On 02/06/2022 16:59, Joakim Petersen wrote: > The short upstream state indicator inherits the colour of the last > short > state indicator before it (if there is one), and the sparsity state > indicator inherits this colour as well. Make the colourization of these > state indicators consistent by clearing any colour before printing the > short upstream state indicator, as this immediately follows the last > coloured indicator. > > As of 0ec7c23cdc6 (git-prompt: make upstream state indicator location > consistent, 2022-02-27), colourization in the output of __git_ps1 has > changed such that the short upstream state indicator inherits the > colour > of the last short state indicator before it (if there is one), while > before this change it was white/the default text colour. Some examples > to illustrate this behaviour (assuming all indicators are enabled and > colourization is on): > * If the local tree is clean and there is something in the stash, both > the '$' and the short upstream state indicator following it will be > blue. > * If the local tree has new, untracked files, both the '%' and the > short upstream state indicator will be red. > * If all local changes are added to the index and the stash is empty, > both the '+' and the short upstream state indicator following it > will > be green. > * If the local tree is clean and there is nothing in the stash, the > short upstream state indicator will be white/${default text colour}. > > This appears to be an unintended side-effect of the change, and makes > little sense semantically (e.g. why is it bad to be in sync with > upstream when you have uncommitted local changes?). The cause of the > change is that previously, the short upstream state indicator appeared > immediately after the rebase/revert/bisect/merge state indicator (note > the position of $p in $gitstring): > > local f="$h$w$i$s$u" > local gitstring="$c$b${f:+$z$f}${sparse}$r$p" > > Said indicator is prepended with the clear colour code, and the short > upstream state indicator is thus also uncoloured. Now, the short > upstream state indicator follows the sequence of colourized indicators, > without any clearing of colour (again note the position of $p, now in > $f): > > local f="$h$w$i$s$u$p" > local gitstring="$c$b${f:+$z$f}${sparse}$r${upstream}" > > However, adding a clearing of colour before the short upstream state > indicator will change how the sparsity state indicator is colourized, > as it currently inherits (and before the change referenced also > inherited) the colour of the last short state indicator before it. > Reading the commit message of the change that introduced the sparsity > state indicator, afda36dbf3b (git-prompt: include sparsity state as > well, 2020-06-21), it appears this colourization also was unintended, > so clearing the colour for said indicator further increases > consistency. > > Signed-off-by: Joakim Petersen > --- > > Range-diff against v1: > 1: e235caa7a8 = 1: e235caa7a8 git-prompt: make colourization > consistent > > contrib/completion/git-prompt.sh | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/contrib/completion/git-prompt.sh > b/contrib/completion/git-prompt.sh > index 87b2b916c0..dfd6cef35f 100644 > --- a/contrib/completion/git-prompt.sh > +++ b/contrib/completion/git-prompt.sh > @@ -286,6 +286,7 @@ __git_ps1_colorize_gitstring () > if [ -n "$u" ]; then > u="$bad_color$u" > fi > + p="$c_clear$p" > r="$c_clear$r" > } I just realized I forgot to write what changed between the RFC patch and v2: * Clarify the reason why 0ec7c23cdc6 (git-prompt: make upstream state indicator location consistent, 2022-02-27) changed the colourization of the short upstream state indicator. * Explain the rationale for changing the sparsity state colourization. * Include examples of how the short upstream state indicator is currently colourized