From: Derrick Stolee Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2018 00:33:54 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] commit-graph: add repo arg to graph readers Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20180621230608.86117-1-jonathantanmy@google.com> On 6/21/2018 7:06 PM, Jonathan Tan wrote: >>> diff --git a/commit.c b/commit.c >>> index 0030e79940..38c12b002f 100644 >>> --- a/commit.c >>> +++ b/commit.c >>> @@ -317,7 +317,7 @@ struct tree *get_commit_tree(const struct commit *commit) >>> if (commit->graph_pos == COMMIT_NOT_FROM_GRAPH) >>> BUG("commit has NULL tree, but was not loaded from commit-graph"); >>> >>> - return get_commit_tree_in_graph(commit); >>> + return get_commit_tree_in_graph(the_repository, commit); >> Here.. >> >>> } >>> >>> struct object_id *get_commit_tree_oid(const struct commit *commit) >>> @@ -413,7 +413,7 @@ int parse_commit_gently(struct commit *item, int quiet_on_missing) >>> return -1; >>> if (item->object.parsed) >>> return 0; >>> - if (parse_commit_in_graph(item)) >>> + if (parse_commit_in_graph(the_repository, item)) >> and here >> >>> +static void test_parse_commit_in_graph(const char *gitdir, const char *worktree, >>> + const struct object_id *commit_oid) >>> +{ >>> + struct repository r; >>> + struct commit *c; >>> + struct commit_list *parent; >>> + >>> + /* >>> + * Create a commit independent of any repository. >>> + */ >>> + c = lookup_commit(commit_oid); >> .. and this one are unfortunate as the rest of the object store series >> has not progressed as far as needed. > I think the first 2 are in reverse - get_commit_tree depends on > get_commit_tree_in_graph and parse_commit_gently depends on > parse_commit_in_graph, so we need the commit-graph functions to be > changed first. But I agree about lookup_commit. > >> The lookup_commit series is out there already, and that will >> teach lookup_commit a repository argument. When rerolling >> that series I need to switch the order of repo_init and lookup_commit >> such that we can pass the repo to the lookup. > For future reference, Stefan is talking about this series: > https://public-inbox.org/git/20180613230522.55335-1-sbeller@google.com/ > > Let me know if you want to reroll yours on top of mine, or vice versa. I > think it's clearer if mine goes in first, though, since (as you said in > that e-mail) parse_commit depends on this change in the commit graph. I was about to comment that I thought 'parse_commit_in_graph' should take a 'struct commit_graph' instead of 'struct repository', except for these lookup_commit() calls will need the repository parameter. Please also keep in mind that ds/commit-graph-fsck has already updated this method to parse from a specific graph [1]. I'm just waiting for some things like ds/generation-numbers to get into 'master' and some more object-store patches to be final before I re-roll that series. I mentioned this in a message that I had sent, but apparently didn't make it on the list (so I re-sent it recently). [1] https://public-inbox.org/git/20180608135548.216405-4-dstolee@microsoft.com/ >> This is really nice! >> >> Overall this series looks good to me, >> Stefan > Thanks - let's see what others think.