From: Torsten Bögershausen <tboegi@web.de>
Date: Sat, 07 May 2016 16:18:30 GMT
Subject: Re: t6044 broken on pu
Message-ID: <d1fcc54b-ddd7-b03b-79fa-2112a3f43141@web.de>
In-Reply-To: <878tzmrrfg.fsf@linux-m68k.org>

On 2016-05-07 14.19, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Torsten Bögershausen <tboegi@web.de> writes:
> 
>> The "seq" is not understood by all shells,
>> using printf fixes this,
>>
>> index 20a3ffe..48d964e 100755
>> --- a/t/t6044-merge-unrelated-index-changes.sh
>> +++ b/t/t6044-merge-unrelated-index-changes.sh
>> @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ test_description="merges with unrelated index changes"
>>  #   Commit E: renames a->subdir/a, adds subdir/e
>>
>>  test_expect_success 'setup trivial merges' '
>> -       seq 1 10 >a &&
>> +       printf 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 9 10 >a &&
> 
> $ printf 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 9 10
> 1

That's true, but the test passes anyway.
So do we need the sequence ?
Is there something that can be improved in the test ?