From: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2017 19:57:40 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] strbuf: use designated initializers in STRBUF_INIT
Message-ID: <c349f324-8f6d-2fe0-8982-2e37869d37b5@kdbg.org>
In-Reply-To: <20170710070342.txmlwwq6gvjkwtw7@sigill.intra.peff.net>

Am 10.07.2017 um 09:03 schrieb Jeff King:
> On Sun, Jul 09, 2017 at 10:05:49AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> 
>> René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de> writes:
>>
>>> I wonder when we can begin to target C99 in git's source, though. :)
>>
>> Let's get the ball rolling...

Good to know that you do not resist moving to a more modern build 
environment.

>> by starting to use some of the useful
>> features like designated initializers,

It's a pity, though, that you do not suggest something even more useful, 
such as C++14.

> Subject: [PATCH] strbuf: use designated initializers in STRBUF_INIT

> -#define STRBUF_INIT  { 0, 0, strbuf_slopbuf }
> +#define STRBUF_INIT  { .alloc = 0, .len = 0, .buf = strbuf_slopbuf }

While this may serve as a test balloon, changing STRBUF_INIT, or any of 
those _INIT macros, is actually the least interesting. The interesting 
instances are initializations for which we do *not* have a macro.

-- Hannes