From: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2024 16:14:36 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] improve interactive-patch
Message-ID: <c1aa4948-ef2b-470e-896a-1e7ea35d11cc@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <xmqqttkr3ckz.fsf@gitster.g>

On 27/03/2024 15:43, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@gmail.com> writes:
> 
>> ... My
>> reasoning was that 'p' does not do anything useful for the user, if
>> they press it they end up with exactly the same content being printed
>> to the screen ...
> 
> Actually I do not agree that it necessarily is useless that the same
> content is shown.  Especially since we do not page, it is plausible
> for a user, who saw a huge hunk, to want to tweak terminal setting
> and raise scrollbuffer size (which may be set to 0 for usual
> sessions, like me), and say "please show it again".  Or even in a
> more primitive environment, just say "please show it again" and
> immediately type \C-s to stop while the early part of the hunk is
> shown ;-).

Good point, I'd not thought of that - it is useful after all.

> Thinking about the name of the option again, if we are omitting to
> show a hunk in some situations, the request to ask for the current
> hunk to be shown is "please show me", not "please reshow me", so the
> verb 'print' may apply to wider situations than the verb 'reprint',
> strictly speaking.

We're only omitting to show the hunk if we've already shown it so I 
think of it as showing it again but I don't mind much either way.

Thanks

Phillip