From: Miles Bader Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 09:18:33 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] sequencer: factor code out of revert builtin Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Ramkumar Ramachandra writes: > Junio C Hamano writes: >> [...] >> With that observation, it would probably make more sense if "foo.c" >> included the headers in the following order: >> >>  - Anything the declarations in "foo.h" depends on; >>  - "foo.h" itself; and finally >>  - Other headers that "foo.c" implementation needs. >> >> That way, people who want to use "foo.h" can guess what needs to be >> included before using "foo.h" a lot more easily. > > That's a good rule-of-thumb. Thanks :) Does git not use the common practice of self-contained headers? -miles -- Fast, small, soon; pick any 2.