From: Tay Ray Chuan Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2010 18:39:16 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] Add push --set-upstream Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20100116182829.GA27474@sigill.intra.peff.net> Hi, On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 2:28 AM, Jeff King wrote: > On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 12:13:20AM +0800, Tay Ray Chuan wrote: > >> On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 11:56 PM, Ilari Liusvaara >> wrote: >> > Hmm... In what conditions ref->status is 'none' after push operation >> > has completed? >> >> when a match between a local and remote ref is not found. >> >> For example, the local ref 'master' will match the remote ref >> 'master', but not 'retsam' ('master' spelled in reverse). > > How would it make any sense to set up a tracking branch, then? Not only > is it not desired (if I said "git push -u foo:bar", I don't expect it to > do _anything_ with some other local branch besides foo), but it wouldn't > work, since the peer_ref pointer would be NULL. Noted. Ilari, please ignore my thought on 'none' then. -- Cheers, Ray Chuan