From: Tay Ray Chuan Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 05:21:17 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH] git push --track Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Hi, generally, it would be better if you could add some tests for this. If I'm not wrong, the place to put it would be t5516-fetch-push.sh. On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 11:55 PM, Rudolf Polzer wrote: > On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 16:43:10 +0100, Ilari Liusvaara > wrote: please don't drop people from the Cc list - especially when you're replying to somebody! > From 123598516c7d4e1f83591e8dae64e2c76dc87c90 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Rudolf Polzer > Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 16:42:04 +0100 > Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Add a feature "git push --track" to automatically make > the pushed branches tracking Each patch should be sent out in its own mail. (As Matthieu has recommended, you should check out Documentation/SubmittingPatches.) >  static const char * const push_usage[] = { > @@ -115,6 +116,36 @@ static int push_with_options(struct transport > *transport, int flags) >                fprintf(stderr, "Pushing to %s\n", transport->url); >        err = transport_push(transport, refspec_nr, refspec, flags, >                             &nonfastforward); > +       if (err == 0 && flags & TRANSPORT_PUSH_TRACK) { > +               struct ref *remote_refs = > +                       transport->get_refs_list(transport, 1); > +               struct ref *local_refs = get_local_heads(); > +               int match_flags = 0; > +               if (flags & TRANSPORT_PUSH_ALL) > +                       match_flags |= MATCH_REFS_ALL; > +               if (flags & TRANSPORT_PUSH_MIRROR) > +                       match_flags |= MATCH_REFS_MIRROR; > +               if(!(flags & TRANSPORT_PUSH_DRY_RUN)) > +               if(!match_refs(local_refs, &remote_refs, refspec_nr, > refspec, > +                                       match_flags)) { It would be better if you can move this to transport.c::transport_push(). It repeats what's already there, so you don't have to configure match_flags, nor call match_refs, etc. > +                       struct ref *next = remote_refs; > +                       while(next) { > [snip] > +                               next = next->next; In most places, this is done like this: struct ref* ref; for (ref = remote_refs; ref; ref = ref->next) { ... } -- Cheers, Ray Chuan