From: Tay Ray Chuan <rctay89@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 17:15:48 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Allow git to use any HTTP authentication method.
Message-ID: <be6fef0d0912280915k1320110o6a361a0950aa60f6@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20091228155346.GB2252@spearce.org>

Hi,

On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 11:53 PM, Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org> wrote:
> Martin Storsj? <martin@martin.st> wrote:
>> Should I send in a new patch that removes the http.authAny option and
>> always enables this, or send a rewritten version of the patch that already
>> is in 'next'?
>
> I'm not Junio, but I would suggest sending in a new patch series,
> and asking Junio politely to revert the one that is currently in
> next before merging in the new series.
>
> If we really are killing http.authAny before it hits master, there
> is no reason for it to appear in the final project history.

hmm, a few days back Junio (added to Cc list) sent out an email
regarding branch shuffling and dropping topics from 'next'. Junio,
could we piggyback on this?

-- 
Cheers,
Ray Chuan