From: Sverre Rabbelier <alturin@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 21:39:31 GMT
Subject: Re: theirs/ours was Re: [PATCH 6/6] Add a new test for using a custom merge strategy
Message-ID: <bd6139dc0807281439i7f40a914s3cda16a2bdbf6857@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <7vr69dpu9i.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>

On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 23:35, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
>> The quoted sentence by me in that message was after I explained why "per
>> hunk theirs" aka "-Xtheirs" was not such a great idea I further went on to
>> say "by the way, '-s theirs' is even worse and here is why".

Aaah, ok, now I see where my confusion came from. Thank you for
clarifying that. Then remains the question, what to tell those that
want '-s theirs' not to keep track of their changes, but to keep a
fast-forwardable master?

> Heh, I ended up doing the "digging" myself.   The quote came from this:
>
>    http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/89010/focus=89024
>
> and "tried not to sound too negative" there refers to:
>
>    http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/89010/focus=89021
>
> which _was_ about the "-Xtheirs", not "-s theirs".

Understood, it makes sense now.

-- 
Cheers,

Sverre Rabbelier