From: Sverre Rabbelier Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2008 23:19:37 GMT Subject: Re: [RFC] Stopping those fat "What's cooking in git.git" threads Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <7v3am42lk2.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 1:16 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 11:05 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: >>> I could make "What's cooking" not a follow-up to the previous issue, or >>> perhaps add "(volume 1.6.0, issue 28)" at the end of the Subject. >> >> The downside of this is that it'll be less easy to see the difference >> with the previous version. > > My vague recollection is that it was Pasky who complained long time ago > when "What's in" was not a follow-up to its previous round, which led me > to switch my workflow to send them in the current form. You cannot > satisfy certain people no matter what you do. Add an interdiff at the bottom of the mail? You can't satisfy everybody no matter what you do, but you can come quite far, it usually means you have to do a lot of work to do so though.