From: Sverre Rabbelier Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 23:00:11 GMT Subject: Re: Reverting to old commit Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <6IRlPIxadiyIIPsto-MFx6wInl0VvCRxVSaI3-OglmCjLt5obfbiww@cipher.nrlssc.navy.mil> On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 10:43 PM, Brandon Casey wrote: > Shouldn't we be encouraging the use of 'git log -g' rather than 'git reflog'? > git-reflog seems more like plumbing than porcelain to me. I had no idea, but then again, the man pages don't mention whether something is plumbing or porcelain anywhere... But I guess 'git log -g' is easier to use (since it supplies the user with most of git log's features) than git reflog. I was introduced to reflog by someone advising me to use it, so I was merely "passing on" that advice, unknowing of 'git log -g' :). -- Cheers, Sverre Rabbelier