From: Karl Wiberg <kha@treskal.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 21:23:00 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] stg mail: make __send_message do more
Message-ID: <b8197bcb0911291323l35cb3624td3cbc393bf4513b3@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20091128195026.949.1772.stgit@bob.kio>

On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 8:50 PM, Alex Chiang <achiang@hp.com> wrote:

> Factor out the common code required to send either a cover mail
> or patch, and implement it in __send_message.

Nice code size reduction.

> +    msg_id = email.Utils.make_msgid('stgit')
> +    build = { 1: __build_cover, 4: __build_message }
> +    msg = build[len(args)](tmpl, msg_id, options, *args)
> +
> +    from_addr, to_addrs = __parse_addresses(msg)
> +    msg_str = msg.as_string(options.mbox)
> +    if options.mbox:
> +        out.stdout_raw(msg_str + '\n')
> +        return msg_id
> +
> +    outstr = { 1: 'the cover message', 4: 'patch "%s"' % args[0] }
> +    out.start('Sending ' + outstr[len(args)])

You could consolidate the two dictionaries like this, to avoid making
the same choice twice and make the code more pleasant to read:

  (build, outstr) = { 1: (__build_cover, 'the cover message'), 4:
(__build_message, 'patch "%s"' % args[0]) }

> +    # give recipients a chance of receiving related patches in correct order
> +    #                                       patch_nr < total_nr
> +    if len(args) == 1 or (len(args) == 4 and args[1] < args[2]):
> +        sleep = options.sleep or config.getint('stgit.smtpdelay')
> +        time.sleep(sleep)

Hmm. I must say I find all the args[x] a bit hard to read. I'd prefer
symbolic names.

-- 
Karl Wiberg, kha@treskal.com
   subrabbit.wordpress.com
   www.treskal.com/kalle