From: Justin Tobler <jltobler@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2025 16:08:10 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] refs: simplify logic when migrating reflog entries
Message-ID: <b4mvddzjkdv3htup4htigdifp3zydrknhheza4vn3dqkecgx55@vyhj57qanllk>
In-Reply-To: <20250728-pks-remote-rename-improvements-v1-2-f654f2b5c5ae@pks.im>

On 25/07/28 03:08PM, Patrick Steinhardt wrote:
> diff --git a/refs.c b/refs.c
> index fd9a5f36b20..b820c3908bd 100644
> --- a/refs.c
> +++ b/refs.c
> @@ -2942,6 +2942,7 @@ struct migration_data {
>  	struct ref_transaction *transaction;
>  	struct strbuf *errbuf;
>  	struct strbuf sb, name, mail;
> +	uint64_t index;
>  };
>  
>  static int migrate_one_ref(const char *refname, const char *referent UNUSED, const struct object_id *oid,
> @@ -2974,14 +2975,6 @@ static int migrate_one_ref(const char *refname, const char *referent UNUSED, con
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> -struct reflog_migration_data {
> -	uint64_t index;
> -	struct ref_store *old_refs;
> -	struct ref_transaction *transaction;
> -	struct strbuf *errbuf;
> -	struct strbuf *sb, *name, *mail;
> -};

When I recently was looking at this in [1], I remember finding this
rather awkward/confusing. Very happy to see it go now in favor of
something much simpler :)

-Justin

[1]: <tg72v5vgu56b6akawy7sfapi2qtrmy7q3uruhersy4dtzkpvju@wamlylndp3xv>