From: Patrick Steinhardt Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2026 08:14:17 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] sequencer: keep auto maintenance out of the commands a sequence spawns Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <9a6fc0427a8bc7e7abcc0518214b1dafc2efaa6a.1788537086.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com> On Fri, Sep 04, 2026 at 03:51:26PM +0000, Thomas Bachem via GitGitGadget wrote: > diff --git a/sequencer.c b/sequencer.c > index 67e1c38762..5df07750a7 100644 > --- a/sequencer.c > +++ b/sequencer.c > @@ -1107,6 +1114,27 @@ static int run_command_silent_on_success(struct child_process *cmd) > return rc; > } > > +/* > + * A sequence runs auto maintenance once it is done, not from every command > + * it spawns along the way: their background "rerere gc" or repack would > + * race the sequencer for locks and files it still holds. > + */ > +static void disable_auto_maintenance(struct replay_opts *opts, > + struct child_process *cmd) > +{ > + struct strbuf *params = &opts->ctx->config_parameters; > + > + if (!params->len) { > + const char *old = getenv(CONFIG_DATA_ENVIRONMENT); > + > + if (old && *old) > + strbuf_addstr(params, old); > + git_config_append_parameter(params, "maintenance.auto", "false"); > + git_config_append_parameter(params, "gc.auto", "0"); > + } > + strvec_pushf(&cmd->env, "%s=%s", CONFIG_DATA_ENVIRONMENT, params->buf); > +} > + Why do you set both "maintenance.auto" and "gc.auto"? Setting only the former should be sufficient, as maintenance uses git-maintenance(1) exclusively nowadays. Sure, it may trigger git-gc(1) internally. But it won't ever do so if auto-maintenance is completely disabled. Patrick