From: Justin Tobler Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2026 15:33:12 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] builtin/receive-pack: lift global state out of unpack() Message-ID: In-Reply-To: On 26/08/07 09:03AM, Patrick Steinhardt wrote: > On Thu, Aug 06, 2026 at 04:38:56PM -0500, Justin Tobler wrote: > > In git-receive-pack(1), writing the packfile to the transaction is > > handled via `unpack()` which relies on global variables to decide how to > > invoke the underlying git-index-pack(1) or git-unpack-objects(1) child > > processes. In a subsequent commit, the `unpack()` logic is moved behind > > a generic ODB transaction interface to handle writing packfiles and thus > > can no rely on these globals. > > Nit: either "can not" or "can no longer". Will fix. > > diff --git a/builtin/receive-pack.c b/builtin/receive-pack.c > > index 6da854fca2..8c2d6e5789 100644 > > --- a/builtin/receive-pack.c > > +++ b/builtin/receive-pack.c > > @@ -2333,18 +2333,25 @@ static void push_header_arg(struct strvec *args, struct pack_header *hdr) > > ntohl(hdr->hdr_version), ntohl(hdr->hdr_entries)); > > } > > > > +struct unpack_opts { > > + const char *fsck_msg_types; > > + const char *shallow_file; > > + off_t max_input_size; > > + int fsck_objects; > > + int unpack_limit; > > + int reject_thin; > > + int err_fd; > > + int quiet; > > +}; > > + > > static const char *unpack(struct odb_transaction *transaction, > > - const char *shallow_file, int err_fd) > > + const struct unpack_opts *opts) > > { > > struct pack_header hdr; > > const char *hdr_err; > > int status; > > struct child_process child = CHILD_PROCESS_INIT; > > - int fsck_objects = (receive_fsck_objects >= 0 > > - ? receive_fsck_objects > > - : transfer_fsck_objects >= 0 > > - ? transfer_fsck_objects > > - : 0); > > + int err_fd = opts->err_fd; > > > > hdr_err = parse_pack_header(&hdr); > > if (hdr_err) { > > It's quite hard to see that the function indeed doesn't rely on the > global variables anymore, and I'm quite certain that I'd not spot cases > that you forgot to convert to use the options structure instead. But I > assume that the function will move into a different file in a subsequent > commit, so we'd notice in that patch. Ya, that is indeed the plan. :) > > @@ -2428,11 +2435,24 @@ static const char *unpack(struct odb_transaction *transaction, > > static const char *unpack_with_sideband(struct odb_transaction *transaction, > > const char *shallow_file) > > { > > + struct unpack_opts opts = { > > + .fsck_objects = (receive_fsck_objects >= 0 > > + ? receive_fsck_objects > > + : transfer_fsck_objects >= 0 > > + ? transfer_fsck_objects > > + : 0), > > This looks quite ugly, but it's no more ugly than the previous code it > replaces. In a different version of this patch, I modified the fsck objects field after initialization and dropped the single statement here, but I ultimately didn't think that looked much better either. -Justin