From: Johannes Schindelin Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 13:11:03 GMT Subject: Re: What's not in 'master', and likely not to be until 1.5.4 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <72B49AA2-B82F-448D-8401-BE1D03C9DCA9@zib.de> Hi, On Fri, 18 Jan 2008, Steffen Prohaska wrote: > On Jan 18, 2008, at 12:40 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > > Johannes Sixt writes: > > > > > BTW, how would you like to have a 40+ patch series presented that > > > implements the port to MinGW? Should I send to the ML despite its > > > volume? > > > > My gut feeling is that you did your usual great job separating them > > into logical chunks and it will be a pleasure to review on the usual > > channel, just like the trickle you did earlier. > > > > > The current state of the series is available here: > > > http://repo.or.cz/w/git/mingw/j6t.git?a=shortlog;h=upstream > > > > Let me take a look sometime (but I cannot even say when right now). > > I might change my mind about the above. > > I have one or two patches that could be added, most notably the gpg/CRLF > patch. Maybe we should discuss them before the whole series is proposed > for git.git? Maybe not; then I'd send my patches to the list after > Junio applied your series. I think it is long enough as it is. My plan is to look at the 40+ patches, and try to find a sensible subgrouping so that they can be sent in bite-sized chunks. Ciao, Dscho