From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@inai.de>
Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2013 18:30:36 GMT
Subject: Re: erratic behavior commit --allow-empty
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.01.1301121927350.15558@nerf07.vanv.qr>
In-Reply-To: <506AA51E.9010209@viscovery.net>


On Tuesday 2012-10-02 10:26, Johannes Sixt wrote:
>
>Note that git commit -m A --allow-empty *DID* create a commit. Only, that
>it received the same name (SHA1) as the commit you created before it
>because it had the exact same contents (files, parents, author, committer,
>and timestamps). Obviously, your script was executed sufficiently fast
>that the two commits happend in the same second.

What about introducing nanosecond-granular timestamps into Git?