From: Julian Phillips Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2009 17:19:54 GMT Subject: Re: Git Logo Message-ID: In-Reply-To: On Mon, 3 Aug 2009, Jakub Narebski wrote: > David Soria Parra writes: >> On 2009-08-03, Scott Chacon wrote: > >>> Who owns the copyright to the Git logo as seen here? >>> >>> http://git.or.cz/gitwiki/FrontPage?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=git-logo.png >> [ - snip discussion of git repo history - ] >> From examining file with 'identify -verbose' from ImageMagick you can > see > Version: ImageMagick 6.2.2 05/24/06 Q16 > (I guess that mean 24 June 2005, not 24 May 2006). Er ... isn't that just the version of ImageMagick you are using? (i.e. the same as the output of 'identify -version') > That doesn't help (much) to get to know who is the author of > git_logo.png, and what license it is under. I expect it to be GPLv2 > (or GPLv2 or later) licensed, like the rest of Git. The majority of the early commits to gitweb don't include any comments, but I did find an early post from Kay to the mailing list lurking buried down there in my mail folder: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/1075 I guess that the logo referred to is the same one ... -- Julian --- The person you rejected yesterday could make you happy, if you say yes.