From: Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@iabervon.org>
Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 02:17:37 GMT
Subject: Re: "checkout --track -b" broken? (with suggested fix)
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.1.00.0810172119020.19665@iabervon.org>
In-Reply-To: <7vskqug4fy.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>

On Fri, 17 Oct 2008, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@iabervon.org> writes:
> 
> > On Thu, 16 Oct 2008, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> >
> >> The patch to branch.c is a quick fix for this issue.  The resulting code
> >> passes all the tests, but I am not very proud of hardcoding the "HEAD" in
> >> the code.  There must be a better way to do this.
> >
> > I agree with the change to the test. I think it would be better to 
> > hard-code "refs/heads/" instead of "HEAD", and I feel like we must have a 
> > "is this ref name a branch?" function, if only because someone could stick 
> > "refs/tags/foo" in HEAD, and we should still say it's not something you 
> > could track, despite it being something different from "HEAD".
> 
> But you can track things under refs/remotes/, so...

Ah, true. Maybe hard-code "refs/". Or have an "is this ref name a branch?" 
function that's paying more attention than I am, and returns true from 
both local branches and (local copies of) remote branches.

	-Daniel
*This .sig left intentionally blank*