From: Daniel Barkalow Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 19:32:14 GMT Subject: Re: Re* [PATCH] "not uptodate" changed to "has local changes" Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <7vzlqm89tj.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> On Mon, 19 May 2008, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Wincent Colaiuta writes: > > > El 17/5/2008, a las 21:03, Junio C Hamano escribió: > >> + /* not_uptodate_file */ > >> + "Entry '%s' not uptodate. Cannot merge.", > > > > > > Minor nit, "uptodate" is not a word. Should be either "up-to-date" or > > "up to date"; most dictionaries list both. > > Why does *everybody* keep missing the whole point of this patch? That section needs a comment stating that it's the scripting API, not just an arbitrary set of messages. For that matter, maybe those shouldn't be the default set, but an alternate set used (as a group) by plumbing programs; I don't think it's too likely that there will be a whole lot of new plumbing programs, and new porcelain programs that don't specify anything probably ought to get something more generic. -Daniel *This .sig left intentionally blank*