From: Daniel Barkalow Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 22:58:15 GMT Subject: Re: Which freedesktop.org "design flaws" in git are still relevant? Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <76718490802291440x60896c93i26d8d0c2cf5678b2@mail.gmail.com> On Fri, 29 Feb 2008, Jay Soffian wrote: > On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 4:58 PM, Daniel Barkalow wrote: > > > I wonder if it would be nice to have per-branch aliases, so that you > > could have "git update" do whatever is appropriate to update this > > particular branch, whether it be "git pull --no-commit" or "git reset > > --hard origin/next && git merge" or "git rebase". > > Well, you effectively have this via > branch.*.{merge,mergeoptions,rebase,remote}. e.g.: > > To effect fetch + non-committing merge: > > branch..remote = origin > branch..merge = refs/heads/ > branch..mergeoptions = --no-commit > > To effect fetch + rebasing: > > branch..remote = origin > branch..merge = refs/heads/ > branch..rebase = true Ah, good point. I'd forgotten mergeoptions. > To effect reset --hard origin/next, add another fetch line to your > remote. e.g.: > > [remote "origin"] > url = git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/git/git.git > fetch = +refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/* > fetch = refs/heads/pu:/refs/heads/pu-readonly This case is actually tougher. I've got: [branch "good-stuff"] remote = . merge = refs/heads/ merge = refs/heads/ merge = refs/heads/ This branch is my local equivalent of "pu" for my own topics, which gets next + each topic I have in a testable state (by way of an octopus merge). So I reset to origin/next and merge a lot of local branches. -Daniel *This .sig left intentionally blank*