From: Linus Torvalds Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2009 21:13:13 GMT Subject: Re: Performance issue of 'git branch' Message-ID: In-Reply-To: On Sat, 25 Jul 2009, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > The fact that apparently sometimes it's less bloated than other times > doesn't really change anything fundamental, does it? Btw, does anybody know how/why libdl seems to get linked in too? We're not doing -ldl, and I'm not seeing any need for it, but it's definitely there on fedora, at least. It seems to come from libcrypto. I can get rid of it with NO_OPENSSL, and that cuts down on the number of system calls in my startup by 16 (getting rid of both libcrypto and libdl). I wonder if there is some way to get the optimized openssl sha1 routines _without_ that silly ldl thing. Linus