From: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 20:10:37 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block-sha1: Windows declares ntohl() in winsock2.h
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0908181607240.6044@xanadu.home>
In-Reply-To: <XJM0H8pTiCJpryS-arPltHCHwsm0djqVixaH1NwBqT2pci2MA9karw@cipher.nrlssc.navy.mil>

On Tue, 18 Aug 2009, Brandon Casey wrote:

> The SUNWspro compiler doesn't set __i386__.  Instead it sets __i386, and
> I think __x86_64 and __amd64 where appropriate.  So, compilation with
> the SUNWspro compiler on x86 is currently unaffected by these changes and
> falls back to the generic routines.
> 
> It seems that v5.10 of the compiler can grok both the __asm__ statements
> and the ({...}) naked block notation and passes all of the tests when the
> block_sha1 code is modified to add defined(__i386) to each of the macro
> statements.

Does it really implement the gcc inline assembly syntax?


Nicolas