From: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 12:38:50 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Be more careful when determining whether a remote was configured
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1701181338041.3469@virtualbox>
In-Reply-To: <xmqqd1flcosv.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>

Hi Junio,

On Tue, 17 Jan 2017, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Perhaps instead of adding "is it configured?" flag that is too
> broadly named and has too narrow meaning, would it make more sense
> to introduce "int can_prune(struct remote *remote)" that looks at
> the remote refspecs?

That ("can we prune?") is not the question we need to ask when determining
whether we can rename a remote to a new name.

Ciao,
Johannes