From: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2016 09:52:50 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] Use the newly-introduced regexec_buf() function
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1609091151510.129229@virtualbox>
In-Reply-To: <xmqq1t0ujp2f.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>

Hi Junio,

On Thu, 8 Sep 2016, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Please give these three patches a common prefix, e.g.
> 
> 	regex: -G<pattern> feeds a non NUL-terminated string to	regexec() and fails
>         regex: add regexec_buf() that can work on a non NUL-terminated string
> 	regex: use regexec_buf()
> 
> or something like that.

Done.

> Also I agree with Peff that a test with an embedded NUL would be a
> good thing.

This is something I will leave to somebody else, as it was not my
intention to fix this and I *really* have more pressing things to do right
now... Sorry!

Ciao,
Dscho