From: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2016 13:22:08 GMT
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Git v2.9.1
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1607121520310.6426@virtualbox>
In-Reply-To: <mvmh9bvdnae.fsf@hawking.suse.de>

Hi Andreas,

On Tue, 12 Jul 2016, Andreas Schwab wrote:

> Johannes Schindelin <schindelin@wisc.edu> writes:
> 
> >> PRIuMAX isn't compatible with time_t.
> >
> > That statement is wrong.
> 
> No, it isn't.  PRIuMAX is for uintmax_t, and time_t is not uintmax_t
> (even if they happen to have the same representation).

Sigh.

So if it is wrong, what is right? I hoped that my gentle reprimand in my
previous reply would result in a more helpful response.

Let me guess: PRId64 is what you would have suggested if you had followed
up your negative statement with a "do this instead"?

Ciao,
Johannes