From: David Lang <david@lang.hm>
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 06:18:42 GMT
Subject: RE: Question re. git remote repository
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1301172216310.2151@nftneq.ynat.uz>
In-Reply-To: <1BBEF94B6B46E54980290D150A6F2EDD46B7AAE2@BN1PRD0612MB635.namprd06.prod.outlook.com>

On Fri, 18 Jan 2013, Matt Seitz wrote:

> From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org [git-owner@vger.kernel.org] on behalf of Lang, David [David.Lang@uhn.ca]
>
> The other David Lang (david@lang.hm) believes that using "git push" using NFS or CIFS/SMB may not be safe and reliable.  Based on the following article by the creator of git, I believe using "git push" over NFS or CIFS/SMB is safe and reliable:
>
> http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/122670
>
> The GitFaq wiki also says that using "git push" over NFS or CIFS/SMB is safe and reliable:
>
> https://git.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/GitFaq#What_can_I_use_to_set_up_a_public_repository.3F

I'm glad to learn that git is more robust than I feared.

David Lang