From: Peter Krefting <peter@softwolves.pp.se>
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2014 07:25:43 GMT
Subject: Re: Confusing error message in rebase when commit becomes empty
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1406130823251.27436@ds9.cixit.se>
In-Reply-To: <CABURp0q1c+75VzMfttDWVXhTFma3g=Tj938J_9i9xhG1yuMpdQ@mail.gmail.com>

Phil Hord:

> Did you have a series of three commits being squashed in your to-do
> list?  I mean, did you have a list like this:
>
>   pick ...  do foo
>   squash ...  revert "do foo"
>   squash ...  What I really meant to do.

Yes, that is exactly what I had. Plus an extra commit that I moved to 
the end, which was originally placed between the "do foo" and "revert 
do foo" commits (which is why I wasn't 110% sure the combination of 
the two would produce an empty commit).

> Yes, but empty commits are discouraged on some projects.  If you 
> want your "change + revert = empty" commit to appear after the 
> squash, I would expect you would want to use --keep-empty on your 
> inital rebase command.  But I'm not sure that will do what you 
> expected either; it may only keep previously-empty commits during 
> the rebase.

The thing is that I wasn't expecting it to come out empty, as I had 
another commit to squash into it. That the interim throw-away squashed 
commit was empty should have been an internal matter to rebase, IMHO.

-- 
\\// Peter - http://www.softwolves.pp.se/