From: Peter Krefting <peter@softwolves.pp.se>
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 10:41:41 GMT
Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/2] Add Swedish translation.
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1009161134390.18826@ds9.cixit.se>
In-Reply-To: <A612847CFE53224C91B23E3A5B48BAC749BFA3D12C@xmail3.se.axis.com>

Peter Kjellerstedt:

>>>> +#: builtin/commit.c:380
>>>> +msgid "cannot do a partial commit during a merge."
>>>> +msgstr "kan inte utföra en delvis incheckning under en sammanslagning."
>>> "delvis" -> "partiell"
>> Is that better? Sounds a bit to technical to me.
> Well, "en delvis incheckning" doesn't sound like correct Swedish...

"Partiell" is something I connect with solar eclipses, can't say I can 
remember hearing it much elsewhere. But any ideas for better wording are of 
course appreciated.

>>>> +#: builtin/commit.c:737
>>>> +msgid "Error building trees"
>>>> +msgstr "Fel vid byggande av träd"
>>> "byggande av träd" -> "trädbygge" ?
>> That sounds even weirder to me.
> Hmm, you may be right. Alternatives for "byggande" is
> "konstruktion" and "skapande", don't know if either of those
> make it sound better.

Changing to "skapande", that sounds better IMHO.

>>> "dekorerade" -> "annoterade"
>> Is that a word?
> Yes. At least it is in SAOL which I think should be indicative of its 
> existence ;)

I take your word (no pun intended) for it. Changing everywhere.

>>>> +#: builtin/log.c:825
>>>> +#, c-format
>>>> +msgid "insane in-reply-to: %s"
>>>> +msgstr "tokigt in-reply-to: %s"
>>> "tokigt" -> "tokig"
>> My sense of language says that it should be "neutrum", so "tokigt".
> Well, I read it with an implicit "header" (i.e., as "insane in-reply-to 
> header: %s")...

Exactly. And "header" is "huvud", which is neuter.

>>>> +#: builtin/merge.c:651
>>>> +#, c-format
>>>> +msgid "Unknown option for merge-recursive: -X%s"
>>>> +msgstr "Felaktig flagga för merge-recursive: -X%s"
>>> "merge-recursive" -> "rekursiv ihopslagning" ?
>> No, merge-recursive is a name of a merge strategy.
> Maybe add quotes around it then do indicate that?

Added.

>>> "t.ex" -> "t ex"
>> I think it looks clearer with the full stop.
> Then it should be "t. ex." according to SAOL.

Yes, but then I overflow an 80 character line... :-/

>>>> +#: builtin/revert.c:270
>>>> +#, c-format
>>>> +msgid "Error wrapping up %s"
>>>> +msgstr "Fel vid ombrytning av %s"
>>> I do not think this "wrapping up" refers to reformatting of the commit 
>>> message. I think it refers to finishing writing the message (a 
>>> rephrasing of the English message is advisable). Thus the Swedish 
>>> translation should probably be:
>>>
>>> "Fel vid avslutandet av %s"
>> Are you sure about that? I was unable to figure it out when I looked at
>> it.
> I am pretty sure. That error message is output in case a file called 
> "somefile.lock" cannot be closed and renamed to "somefile" (see 
> lockfile.c:commit_lock_file().)

Indeed. Fixed. Thanks for clarifying it.

>>>> +#: builtin/tag.c:196
>>>> +msgid "gpg did not accept the tag data"
>>>> +msgstr "gpg godtog inte taggdata"
>>> "taggdata" -> "taggdatan"
>> "taggdatana" in that case. "data" is always plural.
> Maybe better to use "tagginformationen"?

Yes. Much better! Thanks.

-- 
\\// Peter - http://www.softwolves.pp.se/