From: Peter Krefting Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 08:36:22 GMT Subject: Problems with filters and git status - reproduction steps Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Peter Krefting: > However, as I have set the "ident" attribute, Git wants to expand it itself > and check in files with "$Id$". When I do a reset, it seems it records the > entry as clean against a version stored with just "$Id$", but the record in > history has an expanded "$Id$", and the entry is thus never deemed clean. Actually, that is not the case. It seems to be the filter that causes the problems, all by itself. I cannot seem to reproduce this *reliably*. I tried setting up a minimal repository and a reproduction recipe, but I get different behaviour when I perform the steps manually, and when I run it from a shell script. Here is the reproduction recipe: #!/bin/bash # Reproduction recipe for $Date$ dirty issue ORIGINREPO=git://git.debian.org/users/peterk/gitfilterproblem.git DESTINATIONREPO=gitfilterproblem-testrepo # Set up repository echo -- Cloning git clone ${ORIGINREPO} ${DESTINATIONREPO} cd ${DESTINATIONREPO} # Status should be clean echo -- After cloning, status should be clean git status # Set up filter echo -- Set up filter, status should be clean ./reposetup.sh git status # Create tracking branch echo -- Create tracking branch for changed file, status should be clean git branch --track changed-text-files origin/changed-text-files git status # Merge the branch echo -- Merge the changes from the branch, now status gets unclean git merge changed-text-files echo git status git diff -- \\// Peter - http://www.softwolves.pp.se/