From: Martin von Zweigbergk <martin.von.zweigbergk@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2010 19:05:42 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rebase: pass --signoff option to git am
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.1011272002090.26955@debian>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=qAus_w18sYXP7m+jtQOGtgkNrsxgiNcbHevC7@mail.gmail.com>


On Sun, 28 Nov 2010, Sverre Rabbelier wrote:

> Heya,
> 
> On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 12:15, Giuseppe Bilotta
> <giuseppe.bilotta@gmail.com> wrote:
> >  -p::
> >  --preserve-merges::
> >        Instead of ignoring merges, try to recreate them.
> > +
> > +--signoff::
> > +       This flag is passed to 'git am' to sign off all the rebased
> > +       commits (see linkgit:git-am[1]).
> > +       Incompatible with the --interactive option.
> 
> The one above that does have a shorthand (-p), why should we (not?)
> give --signoff it's customary -s shorthand here?

The '-s' flag is unfortunately already taken. It is used for
specifying a merge strategy.

/Martin