From: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 15:50:37 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] remote-http(s): Support SOCKS proxies
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.00.1510271649430.31610@s15462909.onlinehome-server.info>
In-Reply-To: <xmqqvb9tdr7v.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>

Hi,

On Mon, 26 Oct 2015, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> James McCoy <vega.james@gmail.com> writes:
> 
> >> The code looks OK but the last paragraph makes _us_ worried.  What
> >> is the licensing status of the original at SO?
> >
> > According to Stackoverflow[0],
> >
> >   As noted in the Stack Exchange Terms of Service[1] and in the footer of
> >   every page, all user contributions are licensed under Creative Commons
> >   Attribution-Share Alike[2]. Proper attribution[3] is required if you
> >   republish any Stack Exchange content.
> >
> > [0]: https://stackoverflow.com/help/licensing
> 
> Yes, and (please correct me if I am wrong--this is one of the times
> I hope I am wrong!) I thought BY-SA does not mesh well with GPLv2,
> in which case we cannot use this patch (instead somebody has to
> reimplement the same without copying).

Pat, could you please allow us to insert your SOB?

Thanks,
Dscho